The best way to evaluate the effectiveness of an advertising campaign is by using ROI.
ROI is the return on investment made in a product, ad campaign, or other activity. Any ROI value greater than zero reflects net profitability, while a negative value is a clear sign of a loss-making ad campaign.
The return on investment can be calculated using the following formula:
ROI = (Income – Advertising Costs) / Advertising Costs * 100%, where income is the difference between revenue and the cost of making a product or providing a service.
What if your ad campaign is already running and you're spending money on it, but your profit won’t be calculated until after users make purchases?
In this case, you can use LTV predictions to forecast how much a particular user will spend in your app or on your website over their lifetime with your brand.
This way, you can estimate the revenue that users attracted by the ad campaign will bring, and consequently calculate the ROI and effectiveness of an ad campaign that is already running.
First, let’s take a closer look at how LTV predictions work.
LTV predictions are based on data about purchase history and user behavior in an application or on a website.
The longer an ad campaign runs, the more events take place, enabling more accurate LTV predictions. Go to our documentation to learn more about the accuracy of LTV predictions in various scenarios.
To generate an LTV prediction, seven days of running an ad campaign are enough. During this period, sufficient data is accumulated to decide on the campaign’s effectiveness without spending a large portion of the budget.
But is this data enough to resolve that the ad campaign must be disabled, and how much money can be saved by doing so on the seventh day? These are the questions we seek to answer in our study.
Objective 1. Understand the feasibility of using LTV predictions to make decisions regarding the effectiveness of ad campaigns.
Objective 2. Identify potential cost savings that can be achieved by disabling an ineffective ad campaign at the right time based on LTV predictions.
To achieve our study objectives, we analyzed two metrics:
For Objective 1, we looked at the variance between the predicted LTV and the actual LTV.
For Objective 2, we measured the potential cost savings that could be achieved by utilizing LTV prediction data about expected losses to disable the ad campaign.
We selected seven ad campaigns across four major gaming projects. We chose these projects because they get the most value out of LTV predictions due to a large number of ad campaigns with varying budgets, creatives, and targeted territories.
2021–2022. We selected this timeframe to ensure a significant time gap between the ad campaigns and our analysis, enabling us to make a more robust comparison between the predicted LTV and the actual LTV.
The predicted ROI of this ad campaign was negative right from its launch in December 2021. Over the following months, it continued to deteriorate, yet the marketing team failed to decide to disable the campaign, thereby generating losses.
Month | Ad costs (US$) | Predicted 6M LTV (US$) | Actual 6M LTV (US$) | Predicted ROI | Actual ROI |
Dec 2021 | 16009,14 | 13569,03 | 11407,33 | -15% | -29% |
Jan 2022 | 54566,16 | 44464,58 | 36785,46 | -19% | -33% |
Feb 2022 | 68364,78 | 39486,48 | 48920,15 | -42% | -28% |
Mar 2022 | 45520,46 | 28017,46 | 22094,54 | -38% | -51% |
Apr 2022 | 29478,32 | 19265,13 | 12793,36 | -35% | -57% |
May 2022 | 33551,5 | 33705,17 | 20332,33 | 0% | -39% |
Jun 2022 | 13233,75 | 6652,49 | 5112,55 | -50% | -61% |
Ad campaign performance
Another ad campaign for App 1 also showed negative ROI from its very outset, with further deterioration over time. This campaign was not disabled either, resulting in multi-million dollar losses.
Month | Ad costs (US$) | Predicted 6M LTV (US$) | Actual 6M LTV (US$) | Predicted ROI | Actual ROI |
Nov 2021 | 10934,23 | 4875,89 | 5702,57 | -55% | -48% |
Dec 2021 | 23266,09 | 18746,48 | 19614,26 | -19% | -16% |
Jan 2022 | 39885,84 | 32903,72 | 20536,6 | -18% | -49% |
Feb 2022 | 23497,35 | 14277,82 | 12042,86 | -39% | -49% |
Mar 2022 | 19886,2 | 14376,86 | 9485,77 | -28% | -52% |
Apr 2022 | 34002,86 | 18352,28 | 14647,58 | -46% | -57% |
May 2022 | 14418,4 | 8708,02 | 5207,01 | -40% | -64% |
Jun 2022 | 22860,4 | 16801,53 | 16841,74 | -27% | -26% |
Jul 2022 | 26614,32 | 24080,43 | 15884,56 | -10% | -40% |
Ad campaign performance
Unlike previous cases, this ad campaign for App 2 showed promising results in March 2022.
Month | Ad costs (US$) | Predicted 6M LTV (US$) | Actual 6M LTV (US$) | Predicted ROI | Actual ROI |
Jan 2022 | 17806,09 | 14953,71 | 14691,91 | -16% | -17% |
Feb 2022 | 11823,17 | 6195,7 | 4832,23 | -48% | -59% |
Mar 2022 | 6135,77 | 7548,78 | 8064,3 | 23% | 31% |
Apr 2022 | 4565,38 | 1502,27 | 2079,9 | -67% | -54% |
May 2022 | 157,12 | 30,96 | 26,95 | -80% | -83% |
Ad campaign performance
The ad campaign for App 3 lasted three months and was also making losses right from the outset.
Month | Ad costs (US$) | Predicted 6M LTV (US$) | Actual 6M LTV (US$) | Predicted ROI | Actual ROI |
Jan 2022 | 14698,9 | 8011,79 | 6908,83 | -45% | -53% |
Feb 2022 | 25688,58 | 13462,06 | 10741,54 | -48% | -58% |
Mar 2022 | 11675,08 | 2075,86 | 2459,91 | -82% | -79% |
Ad campaign performance
In this case, the marketing team did a better job of scrutinizing the ad campaign’s performance but still failed to leverage LTV predictions. Although they decided to disable the campaign 60 days after its launch, rather than waiting for six months, these 60 days were long enough to generate sizeable losses.
Month | Ad costs (US$) | Predicted 6M LTV (US$) | Actual 6M LTV (US$) | Predicted ROI | Actual ROI |
Jan 2022 | 8418,97 | 4403,99 | 2863,03 | -48% | -66% |
Feb 2022 | 5100,73 | 936,09 | 621,47 | -82% | -88% |
Mar 2022 | 126,43 | 0 | 0 | -100% | -100% |
Ad campaign performance
Similar to the previous case, the decision to disable the ad campaign was made after 60 days, which was too late and also led to losses in the millions.
Month | Ad costs (US$) | Predicted 6M LTV (US$) | Actual 6M LTV (US$) | Predicted ROI | Actual ROI |
Jan 2022 | 3230,29 | 2483,09 | 1766,3 | -23% | -45% |
Feb 2022 | 21452,53 | 16730,05 | 14271,35 | -22% | -33% |
Ad campaign performance
The marketing team of this ad campaign run for App 4 also relied on the actual data over a 60-day period to evaluate the campaign’s performance.
Month | Ad costs (US$) | Predicted 6M LTV (US$) | Actual 6M LTV (US$) | Predicted ROI | Actual ROI |
Feb 2022 | 7269,05 | 6446,59 | 7032,55 | -11% | -3% |
Mar 2022 | 21039,34 | 6743,3 | 9216,28 | -68% | -56% |
Ad campaign performance
In this study, we reviewed seven ad campaigns with different budgets and approaches to advertising management. All of them show that:
You can make your own prediction using instructions put together by our experts. To do this, download our free Ebook How to Predict a Mobile App’s LTV on Your Own.
You can also make use of our free future LTV calculator for subscriptions – just enter your subscription parameters at the campaign launch and get a prediction.
Use MyTracker’s LTV predictions to avoid wasting your ad budgets. This is what an LTV prediction report by MyTracker looks like:
Connect MyTracker and set LTV predictions using our documentation or request a demo to receive expert guidance from our team.